Start
Eve Vaughn - Snowbound (Elloras Cave), Eve Vaughn
Evangeline Anderson - The Man in the Black Leather Mask, Evangeline Anderson
Ewolucja epistemologii w XX wieku, Filozofia, Prof. dr hab. Stanisław Judycki
Essentials of Management Information Systems, Angielskie [EN](4)(2)
esej0005, Kulturoznawstwo, rok II, performatyka, k więckowska - płeć performatywna
Ewolucjonizm a Prawo by Załuski, PRAWO UJ, TEORIA PRAWA
Etapy ćwiczeń w korekcji mowy bezdźwięcznej na przykładzie głosek f ‐ w, Logopedia, Logopedia
Ergonomia01, BHP, Ergonomia, Ergonomia wyklady
eu,
Ewangelia wg Tomasza, Ezoteryka
  • zanotowane.pl
  • doc.pisz.pl
  • pdf.pisz.pl
  • przylepto3.keep.pl

  • Erler; Socrates in the Cave; Platonic epistemology and the common man, Sokrates

    [ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
    M. Erler 1 out of 7
    S
    OCRATES IN THE
    C
    AVE
    .
    P
    LATONIC
    E
    PISTEMOLOGY AND THE
    C
    OMMON
    M
    AN
    1
    . It is well known that Plato defines knowledge in terms of ontological
    categories. Real knowledge for him means grasping the ideas. This
    knowledge can be gained by searching within oneself
    .
    Only philosophers,
    however, are able to attain knowledge this way, transforming themselves
    into the status of gods as far as it is possible for men.
    1
    Plato clearly
    describes an ideal in the dialogues. But Plato also addresses the common
    man’s potential for achieving knowledge despite his deficient condition in
    comparison to the Platonic ideal. In the famous simile of the cave in the
    Republic
    , Plato offers a quite realistic view of common man as being
    emprisoned in a world of becoming.
    2
    This prisoner takes pictures on the
    wall for reality. In order to be freed from this illusion, he has to be
    turned around toward truth. The prisoners, however, are not able to turn
    around themselves without help from outside. What they need is a teacher
    who asks them questions and gets them into conceptual difficulties
    (
    aporiai
    ).
    3
    Common man also is likely to have emotions, desires, and
    * This is part of a larger project that also will deal both with Plato and the
    tradition of the metaphor ‘child in man’ in ancient philosophical contexts.
    1
    Passages: D. Sedley: ‘Becoming like God’ in the
    Timaeus
    and Aristotle‘,
    in: T. Calvo, L. Brisson (edd.): Interpreting the
    Timaeus – Critias
    .
    Proceedings of the IV Symposium Platonicum. Selected Papers (Sankt
    Augustin 1997) [
    International Plato Studies
    9], 327-339 and D. Sedley:
    ‘The Ideal of Godlikeness,’ in: G. Fine (ed.):
    Plato 2.
    Ethics, Politics,
    Religion, and the Soul
    (Oxford 1999), 309-328.
    2
    Th. A. Szlezák: ‘Das Höhlengleichnis (Buch VII 514a-521b und 539d-
    541b),’ in: O. Höffe (Hg.)
    Platon, Politeia
    (Berlin 1997) [
    Klassiker
    auslegen
    7], 205-228.
    3
    Cf.:
    R.
    515c, see: J. Annas:
    An Introduction to Plato's Republic
    (Oxford
    1989), 258f. and M. Erler: ‘Hilfe der Götter und Erkenntnis des Selbst.
    Sokrates als Göttergeschenk bei Platon und den Platonikern,’ in: Th.
    Kobusch, M. Erler (edd.):
    Metaphysik und Religion. Zur Signatur des
    spätantiken Denkens. Akten des Internationalen Kongresses vom 13.-17.
    März 2001 in Würzburg
    (Munich, Leipzig 2002) [BzA 160], 387-413. N.
    Delhey (‘ Bemerkungen zur Bildungstheorie
    in Platons
    Politeia
    ,’ in:
    Hermes
    122 (1994), 44-54, esp. 47ff.) rightly
    M. Erler 2 out of 7
    fears that make him deaf to rational persuasion, and that might overpower
    his rational thinking and cause him to act against his will (
    R.
    519a-b).
    The teacher therefore must try to create the kind of disposition in his
    partner that prepares him to accept the results of rational arguments,
    makes him realize what is true and what is false, and helps him to
    transform this knowledge into moral behavior.
    4
    In the
    Timaeus
    , Plato
    postulates that both the immortal rational self and the mortal self need
    therapy (
    Ti.
    90a-c), in order “to set even the baser part of us on the right
    path in this way” (71d, transl. Cornford). Of course, Plato believes that
    one can achieve real knowledge only if one focuses on the immortal soul.
    But as the Athenian stranger in the
    Laws
    shows, moral practice too is of
    crucial importance for gaining knowledge. Harmonizing the parts of the
    soul and controlling desires and fears, which are located in the mortal part
    of the soul, require self-control.
    5
    For the common man, the therapy of the mortal self and the
    proper control of affections are essential for developing the right habits
    that provide the foundation for virtue and real knowledge.
    Paramythia
    ,
    the therapy of human passion that produces a particular emotional change
    in man so that he becomes more amenable to advice and a better learner
    (
    Lg.
    718cd), is central in the so-called ‘little or basic
    Paideia
    ’ not only in
    the
    Laws
    (734e-735a), but also in the
    Republic
    . Without this
    groundwork, this
    praeparatio philosophica
    , common man will fail to act
    in accordance with the judgements and insights that emerge from
    conversation. To resist right opinion is regarded as lack of knowledge.
    6
    2.
    The theoretical underpinning for the phenomenon that emotions,
    desires, or affections like fear can prevent one from accepting the results
    stresses, that this does not happen simply by nature (so L. C. H. Chen:
    ‘Education in General (
    Rep.
    518c4-519b5),’ in:
    Hermes
    115 (1987), 66-
    72), but by force.
    4
    Cf.
    R.
    401d-402a.
    5
    M. Erler: ‘Epicurus as
    deus mortalis
    .
    Homoiosis theoi
    and Epicurean
    Self-cultivation,’ in: D. Frede, A. Laks (edd.):
    Traditions of Theology.
    Studies in Hellenistic Theology, Its Background and Aftermath
    (Leiden
    2002) [
    Philosophia Antiqua
    89], 159-181, esp. 165f.
    6
    Cf.
    Lg.
    689a; see: K. Schöpsdau:
    Platon
    ,
    Nomoi
    (Gesetze) Buch I-III.
    Übersetzung und Kommentar
    (Göttingen 1994) [
    Platon, Werke
    9,2], 414-
    17.
    M. Erler 3 out of 7
    of rational argument is the soul’s partitioning which Plato develops in the
    Republic
    . This partitioning of the soul explains why reason sometimes is
    overcome by emotion against its will.
    7
    Often this is regarded to be a new insight of Plato’s in the
    Republic
    , because no evidence for the soul’s partitioning can be found
    before the
    Republic
    . This is the thesis I wish to challenge. I shall argue
    that Plato in the
    Phaedo
    playfully considers the existence of something in
    man that is responsible for emotions, desires, and fear, and that is distinct
    from both the body and the rational soul. In the
    Phaedo
    , Plato even gives
    this source of emotions a name: he calls it the ‘child in man’ --and he
    illustrates how it should be treated by therapeutic arguments, in order to
    create a disposition that is amenable to rational thinking. I also wish to
    draw attention to the fact that both this metaphor and the method of
    praeparatio philosophica
    for gaining knowledge was to play an important
    role in the philosophical curriculum from Plato onwards, in Hellenistic
    philosophy as well as in the Platonism of imperial times.
    8
    3.
    Let us have a look at the
    Phaedo
    . In this dialogue, Socrates illustrates
    the power of the
    logos
    or rational argument in helping Socrates to be
    brave and fearless in the face of death, and enabling him to accept rational
    arguments in favor of the soul’s immortality. Contrary to common
    opinion, this dialogue does not teach one how to repress emotions because
    these are the effect of the soul’s imprisonment in the body.
    9
    Rather, the
    Phaedo
    illustrates how to handle emotions that spring from a source that
    is distinct from the body, emotions which cannot be eradicated, but have
    to be controlled, because they disturb rational thinking. The
    exemplum
    Socratis
    illustrates how this can be done successfully. His partners Crito,
    7
    Ll. P. Gerson:
    Knowing Persons. A Study in Plato
    (Oxford 2003), 265.
    I doubt that Ch. Bobonich,
    Plato’s Utopia Recast. His Later Ethics and
    Politics
    (Oxford 2002), is right in arguing that this partitioning of the
    soul in the
    Republic
    later was regarded as an error by Plato and corrected
    in the
    Laws
    .
    8
    I hope to develop this elsewhere.
    9
    See D. Gallop: ‘Emotions in the
    Phaedo
    ,’ in: A. Havlícek, F. Karfík
    (Edd.):
    Plato's Phaedo, Proceedings of the Second Symposium
    Platonicum Pragense
    (Prague 2001), 275-286; cf. J. Dalfen, ‘Philologia
    und Vertrauen: Über Platons eigenartigen Dialog
    Phaidon
    ,’ in:
    GB
    20
    (1994), 35-57.
    M. Erler 4 out of 7
    Cebes, and Simmias, on the other hand, illustrate what happens if
    emotions prevail, and man is not able to subordinate these to reason.
    Crito, for his part, remains unmoved by the arguments, and draws wrong
    conclusions (115c). Cebes and Simmias, in contrast, are used to
    arguments. They are well prepared to follow Socrates’ arguments in
    favor of the soul’s immortality, and to accept the conclusions of rational
    thinking. Nevertheless, they do display insecurity and distrust, while not
    being able to give a reason for this unease. Something within them is out
    of control and prevents them from accepting the results of what they agree
    are coherent arguments.
    10
    This deep-rooted fear Socrates wishes to treat
    by means of his ‘paramythic’ arguments, with which he wishes to address
    both the
    ratio
    and the emotions of his partners.
    11
    It is interesting that in this context, Plato’s Socrates does not
    locate Cebes’ and Simmias’ emotions in the body, as he does elsewhere in
    the
    Phaedo
    .
    12
    No, Plato invents a metaphor to describe the source of the
    affections of Socrates’ partners and the target of Socrates’ therapeutic
    argumentation. At one point, Socrates suspects that Cebes and Simmias
    are afraid like children that wind might disperse the soul after death.
    Cebes points out that it is not he himself who is afraid, but that rather
    something within himself --a child within himself, as he calls it-- is full of
    fear, like children of a bogey (77d-e). He therefore begs Socrates (77d):
    “Try to convince us, then, Socrates, on the assumption that we are afraid;
    or rather, not as though
    we
    are afraid - perhaps there is a
    child inside us
    13
    10
    Cf.
    Phd
    . 77e, 91c-d. 107b.
    11
    Socrates characterizes his arguments as ‘
    paramythia
    ’ (
    )
    (
    Phd.
    70b, 83a).
    12
    Cf.
    Phd.
    81b-c, 94b-c. See: N. Blössner: ‘Sokrates und sein Glück,
    oder: Warum hat Platon den
    Phaidon
    geschrieben?,’ in: A. Havlícek, F.
    Karfík (Edd.):
    Plato's Phaedo, Proceedings of the Second Symposium
    Platonicum Pragense
    (Prag 2001), 96-139, esp. 129ff.
    13
    Phd.
    77e. I agree with Wyttenbach (
    Platonis Phaedo, explanatus et
    emendatus prolegomenis et annotatione Dan. Wyttenbachii
    , Lugdunum
    Batavorum 1810) that the metaphor has to be understood as ‘child within
    us’ and I disagree with Ficino (
    Platonis opera translatione Marsilii
    Ficini, emendatione et ad Graecum codicem collatione Dimonis Grynaei
    1533) and others, who translate
    inter nos puer
    . There has been a
    discussion as to whether the metaphor means doubtful reason (Chr. F.
    Williger: ‘Il
    Di Cebes Nel
    Di Platone,’ in:
    GM
    1 (1946),
    M. Erler 5 out of 7
    that is apprehensive in this way. So try to persuade
    him
    not to be afraid of
    the bogey Death. Try to persuade him, then, to stop being afraid of death
    as if it were a bogey-man.” And Socrates consents readily: “You must
    sing charms over him (
    epodai
    ), said Socrates, every day, until you have
    charmed the fear out of him.”

    To charm the fear out of the child in man as philosophical
    praeparatio,
    ’ this is what Socrates’ rational arguments in the
    Phaedo
    are
    meant to accomplish. This is what Socrates’ ‘
    paramythia
    ’ and
    philosophical ‘
    epode

    14
    are for: to combine rational arguments with
    therapeutic intentions.
    It is useful at this point to remind ourselves that the metaphor
    the ‘child in man which needs persuasion in order to rid itself of the fear
    of death’ has a ‘
    Sitz im Leben.’
    It forms part of the
    paideia
    that tries to
    make children act properly. Plato wishes to remind us of the ‘old wives’
    tales that nurses told children in Greece, as people still do today, in order
    to frighten children into obedience: “If you don’t do such and such, a
    monster will come and eat you.” Those traditional tales are meant to
    create fear in children, and thereby a disposition to accept advice.
    15
    103-113) or an irrational part of the soul (G. Capone Braga, ‘Il
    "Fanciullino" Di Cebete,’ in:
    GM
    2,1947, 60-62, with a response by Chr.
    F. Williger: ‘Ancora Sul "Fanciullino" Di Cebete,’ in:
    GM
    2, 1947, 262-
    264); see also C. H. Young: ‘A Delicacy in Plato's
    Phaedo
    ,’ in:
    CQ NS
    38,1988, 250-251).
    14
    Cf. P. Lain-Entralgo: ‘Die platonische Rationaliserung der Besprechung
    ( ) und die Erfindung der Psychotherapie durch das Wort,’ in:
    Hermes
    86 (1958), 298-323.
    Epode
    as rational argument: cf. Plat.
    Chrm.
    156e-157a;
    Phd.
    77e, Lg. 903a-b, and Chr. Bobonich, ‘Persuasion,
    Compulsion and Freedom in Plato's
    Laws
    ,’ in:
    CQ NS
    41 (1991), 365-
    388, bes. 374. The
    Charmides
    shows, that philosophical argument and
    teaching should follow the protreptic
    praeparatio philosophica
    by means
    of the
    aporia.
    Cf.
    M. Erler:
    Der Sinn der Aporien in den Dialogen
    Platons
    (Berlin, New York 1987) [
    UaLG
    25], 211f.
    15
    Cf. A. Scobie: ‘Storytellers, Storytelling, and the Novel in Graeco-
    Roman Antiquity,’ in:
    RhM
    122 (1979), 229-259 and G. Heldmann:
    Märchen und Mythos in der Antike? Versuch einer Standortbestimmung
    (Munich, Leipzig 2000) [
    BzA
    137], 95ff., who does not mention the
    passage in the
    Phaedo
    .
    [ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
  • zanotowane.pl
  • doc.pisz.pl
  • pdf.pisz.pl
  • jaczytam.opx.pl
  • 
    Wszelkie Prawa Zastrzeżone! Oto smutna prawda: cierpienie uszlachetnia. Design by SZABLONY.maniak.pl.