Start Europejskie partie polityczne jako organizacje wielopoziomowe - Beata Kosowska-Gąstoł PEŁNA WERSJA, N jak Nauka es skrypt1, Studia, Polityka społeczna II stopień, Semestr 1, Gospodarowanie kapitałem ludzkim Europejska Strategia Bezpiecze, Wszystkie przydatne rzeczy na studia, Międzynarodowe stosunki polityczne Eurogeddon - analiza sytuacji rynkowej i potencjału funduszu, Polityka, Gospodarka EUI3 raport I 1607 IBS, Polityka, Instytut Badan Strukturalnych Europa prowadzi taką politykę jak przed Holokaustem, Czytelnia Etyka i polityka MacIntyre Alasdair pobieranie, Nauka Etyka i polityka MacIntyre Alasdair FULL, Nauka Eurogeddon karta marzec 2012, Polityka, Gospodarka Europejska Polityka Miejska (Porozumienie Amsterdamskie), rewitalizacja |
Ethnicity, Etnologia i antropologia, Antropologia polityczna[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies 3, 1 (June, 2001): 34-48. ETHNICITY AND EARNINGS DETERMINATION IN URBAN CHINA ZANG XIAOWEI City University of Hong Kong LI LULU Renmin University The decade of the 1990s witnessed a burst of scholarly publications in the West on ethnic minorities in China, most of which deal with issues such as relations between Han Chinese and minority peoples, ethnic identity, minority cultures and traditions, and the like. 1 To some extent, this scholarly interest in minority peoples in China was inspired by the importance of the ethnic factor in the breakdown of the Soviet Union in 1991 and the potential scenario for ethnic conflict and separatism in China. 2 Indeed, ethnicity may be easily Zang Xiaowei (SSXZ@cityu.edu.hk) teaches Sociology at the City University Of Hong Kong and is the author of Children of the Cultural Revolution (Westview, 2000). Li Lulu is Professor and Head of the Department of Sociology at the People's University in Beijing, China. 1 Nicole Constable, Guest People: Hakka Identity in China and Abroad (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1996); Wolfram Eberhard, China’s Minorities: Yesterday and Today (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1982); Dru C. Gladney, Muslim Chinese: Ethnic Nationalism in the People’s Republic (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996); Awelkhan Hali, Zengxiang Li, and Karl W. Luckert, Kazakh Traditions of China (Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America, 1998); Mette Halskov Hansen, Lessons in Being Chinese: Minority Education and Ethnic Identity in Southwest China (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1998); Stevan Harrell (ed.), Cultural Encounters in China’s Ethnic Frontiers (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1995); Thomas Heberer, China and Its National Minorities: Autonomy or Assimilation? (Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 1989); Colin Mackerras, China’s Minority Cultures: Identities and Integration since 1912 (Melbourne: Longman, 1995); Lucien Pye, “China: Ethnic Minorities and National Security.” pp. 489- 512 in Nathan Glazer and Daniel P. Moynihan (eds.): Ethnicity: Theory and Experience (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975); Justin Jon Rudelson, Oasis Identities: Uyghur Nationalism along China’s Silk Road (New York: Columbia University Press, 1997); David Wu, “Chinese Minority Policy and the Meaning of Minority Culture: The Example of Bai in Yunnan, China.” Human Organization 49/1 (1990): pp. 1-13; Shifu Zhang and David Wu, “Ethnic Conflict and Unity: Examples of Conflict Management in Four Minority Groups in Yunnan, China.” pp. 80-90 in J. D. Boucher, D. Landis and K. Arnold (eds.), Inter-Ethnic Conflict: An International Perspective (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1987). 2 Colin Mackerras, China’s Minorities: Integration and Modernization in the Twentieth Century (Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1994): p. 3; Dru C. Gladney, Ethnic Identity in China (Fort Worth, Harcourt Beace College Publishers, 1998): pp. 170-171; Heberer, China and Its National Minorities , pp. 1, 6-7; George and Spindler Louise Spindler, “Forward.” pp. vi-vii in Dru C. Gladney, Ethnic Identity in China (Fort Worth, Harcourt Ethnicity and Earnings 35 transformed into nationalism and thus become a destabilizing political force capable of breaking down a multi-ethnic country. 3 Nevertheless, this transformation is contingent upon many factors, one of which is inter-ethnic inequality, an under-researched topic in China studies. 4 As Emily Hannum and Yu Xie point out, research on market reforms and social stratification in China has paid little attention to China’s ethnic minorities. 5 As a matter of fact, ethnicity has not been used as a control variable in the existing literature on social stratification in China. 6 Relying on a data set (n = 1,532) collected in Beijing in 1998, we analyze major factors of income inequality by ethnicity in China. In this research, we examine earnings determination mechanisms for Han Chinese and members of ethnic minorities respectively, seeking to understand factors of income inequality by ethnicity in urban China during the 1990s. In the following, we first briefly discuss general information on ethnic minorities in China. We then review the literature on ethnic inequality in China, using it as a reference point for our research. Next, we discuss our data and variables and conduct analysis. Finally, we summarise our research findings and propose possible scenarios on ethnic stratification in urban China. For convenience, we use ethnic nationalities and minorities interchangeably in this research. Beace College Publishers, 1998): p. vi; also see Kumar Rupesinghe, Peter King and Olga Vorkunova, Ethnicity and Conflict in A Post-Communist World: The Soviet Union, Eastern Europe, and China (Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillian, 1992). 3 Craig Calhoun, “Nationalism and Ethnicity.” Annual Review of Sociology 19 (1993): pp. 211-239. 4 Joseph Boskin, Urban Racial Violence in the Twentieth Century (Beverly Hills, Glencoe Press, 1976); F. R. Harris and R, W, Wilkins, (eds.) Quite Riots: Race and Poverty in the United States (New York: Pantheon, 1988); also see Susan Olzak, Suzanne Shanahan, and Elizabeth H. McEneaney, “Poverty, Segregation, and Race Riots: 1960 to 1993.” American Sociological Review 61/4 (1996): pp. 590-613. 5 Emily Hannum and Yu Xie, “Ethnic Stratification in Northwest China: Occupational Differences between Han Chinese and National Minorities in Xinjiang, 1982-1990.” Demography , 35/3 (1998): pp. 323-333, p. 323. 6 See Yanjie Bian, Work and Inequality in Urban China (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994); Yanjie Bian, “Bringing Strong Ties Back In.” American Sociological Review 62/3 (1997): pp. 366-385; Yanjie Bian and John Logan, “Market Transition and Income Inequality in Urban China.” American Sociological Review 61/5 (1996): pp. 739- 758; Barbara Entwisle, Gail E. Henderson, Susan E. Short, Jill Bouma, and Zhai Fengying, “Gender and Family Businesses in Rural China.” American Sociological Review 60/1 (1995): pp.36-57; Victor Nee, “A Theory of Market Transition: From Redistribution to Markets in State Socialism.” American Sociological Review 54/5 (1989): pp. 663-681; Victor Nee, “Social Inequalities in Reforming State Socialism.” American Sociological Review 56/3 (1991): pp. 267-282; Andrew Walder, “Property Rights and Stratification in Socialist Redistributive Economies.” American Sociological Review 57/4 (1992): pp. 524- 539; Andrew Walder, “Career Mobility and the Communist Political Order.” American Sociological Review 60/3(1995): pp. 309-328; Xie Yu and Emily Hannum, “Regional Variation in Earning Inequality in Reform-Era Urban China.” American Journal of Sociology 101/4 (1996): pp. 950-992; Xueguang Zhou, Nancy Brandon Tuma, and Phyllis Moen, “Institutional Change and Job-Shift Patterns in Urban China, 1949 to 1994.” American Sociological Review 62/3 (1997): pp. 393-365. Zhang and Li 36 Ethnic Minorities in China The People’s Republic of China proclaims itself a multinational state and is viewed as such internationally. According to the 1990 census, the Han nationality comprised 92 per cent of China’s total population. The fifty-five officially recognized minority nationalities have a combined population of 91.2 million, scattered through 50 to 60 percent of the border areas which are most important to China in terms of national security. Minority areas are rich in natural resources, including 39.3 per cent of China’s forest area and 89.6 per cent of China’s pastureland. These areas also produce numerous minerals such as iron, manganese, copper, lead, gold, and silver. 7 Who are the recognized ethnic nationalities in China? In other words, how is ethnic nationality status identified and recognized? In China, ethnicity is officially determined and imposed by the central government. During the early 1950s, more than four hundred self-proclaimed ethnic groups submitted their applications to the central government for official recognition of their minority status. By 1957 the central government had recorded over twenty nationalities. Through further identification procedures, in 1979 the government determined that there were fifty-five minorities, which, with the majority Han, made altogether fifty-six nationalities in China. In 1990 officials from the State Nationalities’ Affairs Commission informed a foreign observer that they considered the work of identifying nationalities virtually complete and were unlikely to accept any of the outstanding claims. 8 State recognition of ethnicity matters a lot in China. As Dru C. Gladney points out, ethnic identity is not just something one maintains about oneself, which is open to debate, self-definition, and other-definition; rather, it is a right one possesses, legislated and enforced by the state, marked in one’s passport, and determined at birth or at nationality registration in the case of mixed parentage. One may regard oneself as a member of an ethnic group, but unless that group is recognized as a minority nationality by the state, one is denied the privileges accorded to certain minorities, such as the allowance to have more than one child. Conversely, even if one does not regard oneself as ethnic, but is a member of a nationality designated by the state, one has no choice but to carry his or her unwanted ethnic identity in all official capacity. By giving ethnicity state authority, the government establishes itself as a benefactor and teacher of the “backward” minority peoples, who should eventually “evolve” and assimilate, with appropriate support and leadership provided by the Chinese Communist Party. 9 Despite the state’s tyranny in defining ethnicity, the Chinese government has since 1949 committed itself to protecting and promoting 7 Mackerras, China’s Minorities , p. 198. 8 Fei Xiaotong, “Ethnic Identification in China.” pp. 60-77 in Fei Xiaotong (ed.), Toward A People’s Anthropology (Beijing: New World Press, 1981), p. 60; Heberer China and Its National Minorities , pp. 34-35; Li Honglei, et al., Nationality Work in Contemporary China (Beijing: Dangdai Zhongguo Chubanshe, 1993), pp. 87-88; Mackerras, China’s Minorities , pp. 142-143; Wu, “Chinese Minority Policy”, pp. 1-2. 9 Dru Gladney, “Economy and Ethnicity.” pp. 242-266 in Andrew Walder (ed.) The Waning of the Communist State (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995), pp. 262- 263; Gladney, Ethnic Identity in China , p. 48. Ethnicity and Earnings 37 minorities’ rights and cultural heritages, both materially and symbolically. The government’s affirmative action policy has been largely motivated by its desire to promote inter-ethnic peace, maintain political stability, and preserve territorial integrity. The exception occurred during the Cultural Revolution of 1966-1976 when certain ethnic groups such as Mongolians were persecuted. These wrongs were quietly corrected after 1976. 10 The government protection of minorities’ rights has mainly been reflected in an ethnic entitlement policy that has given minority nationalities preferential consideration in college admission quotas, job placement, and leadership representation. For example, in the 1980s, the government in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region instituted an entitlement policy to include not only government positions but also jobs in higher education. It also decreed that minorities must comprise at least 25 per cent of every college entrance class in the region. 11 Similarly, after 1979, the Han majority has been subject to the one-child birth control policy, while the fertility patterns of ethnic minorities have been regulated by a two-tier birth control policy that permits them to have more than one child. 12 Not surprisingly, members of various ethnic groups have since the 1980s invoked their non-Han origins to acquire rights and privileges afforded only to the officially recognized minorities. 13 Finally, the central government has adopted various measures to promote economic growth in areas with a large number of minority people, such as greater flexibility in local economic practices, increased state funding for local development projects, and more local control over the distribution of tax revenues in minority areas. 14 More importantly, the central government has pumped a large amount of cash into minority areas. For example, in 1988, it contributed 44.7 per cent of the budget of the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region government, 52.7 per cent of the budget of the Inner Mongolian Autonomous Region government, 60.1 per cent of the budget of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region government, 63.3 per cent of the budget of the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region government, and 99.8 per cent of the budget of the Xizang Autonomous Region government. 15 The central government’s financial support in the form of relief funds, direct subsidies, and tax relief has been a key factor for the well-being of the local populations in minority areas. For example, despite the fact that the level of socio-economic development in Tibet is substantially lower than that of China as a whole, in 1981, the annual average income of urban residents in Tibet was 10 Heberer, China and Its National Minorities , pp. 23-29; Bernard Henin, “Ethnic Minority Integration in China: Transformation of Akha Society.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 26/2 (1996): pp. 180-200; William R. Jankowiak, Sex, Death, and Hierarchy in A Chinese City (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993). 11 Jankowiak, Sex, Death, and Hierarchy in a Chinese City , pp. 30-35. 12 Gladney, Ethnic Identity in China ; Jankowiak, Sex, Death, and Hierarchy in A Chinese City , p. 35. 13 Heberer China and Its National Minorities , pp. 78-89; Gladney, Ethnic Identity in China ; Wu, “Chinese Minority Policy”. 14 Gladney, “Economy and Ethnicity”, p. 244; Bernar Vincent Olivier, The Implementation of China’s Nationality Policy in the Northwestern Provinces (San Francisco: Mellen Research University Press, 1993). 15 Ma Rong, Population and Society in Tibet (Beijing: Tongxin Press, 1996), p. 218. Zhang and Li 38 137 RMB higher than that in whole China. This amount represented a substantial income difference at that time. 16 The situation has changed since economic reforms started in 1978. Data show that in 1997 the average annual disposable income of urban residents in Tibet was RMB 5,135, as compared to a national average of RMB 5,160; the figures for 1998 were RMB 5,438 and RMB 5,425 respectively. 17 However, considering the huge gap in development levels between Tibet and China as a whole, one has to conclude that urban residents in Tibet have achieved income parity with urban residents in China mainly because of state financial support. Most experts have focused their attention on ethnic groups in officially designated minority areas in China. 18 In this research we examine an under- studied part of the minority population — members of ethnic groups who are scattered in urban areas where Han residents dominate. Chinese scholars believe that ethnic nationalities living outside minority areas numbered around 18 million in the 1990s, which represents a quarter of the total minority population in China. 19 Judith Banister points out that many of them have found it expedient or necessary to blend in with and adapt to Han culture. “Especially susceptible are the estimated 10 million members of minority groups who live in densely settled areas scattered among the Han.” 20 Before discussing this minority group further, we briefly review the literature on ethnic stratification in China. Existing Studies of Ethnic Stratification in Urban China Existing studies show that the Chinese government has carried out an affirmative action policy because ethnic minorities have historically faced obstacles to status attainment, including geographic remoteness, poverty, and cultural and language barriers. Researchers believe that with certain exceptions, minority nationalities trail the ethnic Chinese population in a variety of socio-economic indicators. 21 Two frequently cited indicators are income and education. Researchers in Mainland China believe that the general educational attainment of minorities is lower than that of Han Chinese. Consequently, members of the minorities are concentrated in blue-collar occupations with low incomes. According to a survey conducted in Beijing in 1988, the average monthly income of Hui residents in Niujie was 71.38 yuan, 16 Ma, Population and Society in Tibet , p. 240; Mackerras, China’s Minorities , pp. 200-205. 17 Statistical Bureau, China Economic Yearbook 1999 (Beijing:China Statistical Press, 1999), pp. 645, 921. 18 Gladney, Ethnic Identity in China ; Hansen, Lessons in Being Chinese ; Harrell (ed.), Cultural Encounters in China’s Ethnic Frontiers ; Mackerras, China’s Minorities ; Rudelson, Oasis Identities ; Wu, “Chinese Minority Policy”; Zhang and Wu, “Ethnic Conflict and Unity”. 19 Li Honglei, et al., Nationality Work in Contemporary China , p. 239. 20 Judith Banister, China’s Changing Population (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987), p. 319. 21 Hannum and Xie, “Ethnic Stratification in Northwest China,” p. 323; Mackerras, China’s Minorities . [ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ] |
||||
Wszelkie Prawa Zastrzeżone! Oto smutna prawda: cierpienie uszlachetnia. Design by SZABLONY.maniak.pl. | |||||